Ricardo Tosto Expresses His Views Regarding Marriage Running Alongside a Stable Union

According to the human rights defender Ricardo Tosto, founder of Leite Tosto and Barros, the case pitting a woman as the plaintiff and a man who was still married in official documents, demonstrated that the stable union was maintained by both parties. The stable union came to an end before the formal divorce of the male partner. According to Ricardo Tosto, and according to what the Fourth Panel of the STJ Portal, the decision to recognize the union was annulled including recognition of division of the assets that were held in the union, with sound legal backing.

Ricardo Opines on Reasons for the Annulment

According to Ricardo Tosto, the reason for the annulment was that one of the partners was married, yet his wife wasn’t called to testify in the suit. The higher court demonstrated its understanding that it is only when the defense of the third party is allowed that a fair decision can be arrived at and that it is only then that a stable union of a person married is admissible. Ricardo Tosto further adds that apart from the annulment of the whole set of the original documents, the higher court determined the citation of the ex-wife. The Superior Court is of the view that it has jurisdiction and right to apply ample defense in the case that involves the woman’s ex-husband and the complainant. Details show that the said companion was in separation but reaffirmed that he had not quitted the home for good. Tosto explains that the partner lived with the woman during the week but went to Fortaleza over the weekends.

Who is Ricardo Tosto

Ricardo Tosto is a well-known lawyer and human rights activist in Brazil. He has a Bachelor of Laws from the Mackenzie Presbyterian University. He topped up his professional training with a Business Administration degree. He has had his fair share of publicity including being featured in the Latin Edition of the Latin Lawyer Magazine. He is the founder of Leite, Tosto and Baros Associates. Mr. Ricardo Tosto along with his Partners have successfully executed Class Action Suits in Brazil. They also happen to have been the first ones to ever file a class action suit in Brazil.

 

Jeremy Goldstein: Most Prestigious Business Lawyer

When it comes to advising Fortune 500 corporations, their preferred business lawyer is Jeremy Goldstein. He specializes in handling cases and transactions that fall into the categories of executive compensation and corporate governance. Over a decade ago, Goldstein established his own law firm called Jeremy L. Goldstein and Associates.

His firm has worked with numerous big-name clients, including Verizon, Merck, and AT&T. Not to be humble, Jeremy Goldstein worked on every major transaction his firm worked on since its establishment. When he’s not working on a major transaction, he’s making appearances at conferences and conventions to discuss executive compensation and corporate governance.

Today, his schedule is filled with compensation committees, CEOs, management teams, and other corporate leaders that need advice about proper employee benefits. In recent years, many corporations stopped providing stock options in favor of more preferred employee benefits. Those who are unsure whether it’s a good decision, go to Goldstein for his advice.

According to Jeremy Goldstein, stock options should still be the preferred compensation method because it comes with advantages that other methods can’t offer. He understands that not every corporation can offer stock options; he’s not recommending that everyone goes back to the traditional benefits.

He wants certain corporations to understand that it’s best for them to return to providing stock options. Most corporations are eliminating stock options because they and their employees don’t trust stock options like people used to. These days, people are more fearful of their benefits becoming worthless in the blink of an eye.

While that is a possibility with stock options, there are a lot of things that corporations don’t take into consideration. It may seem easier to eliminate stock options and offer benefits like higher salaries or wages, better insurance coverage, or even equities.

The truth is, while those options have their upsides, they don’t make employees personally invested in the company. When people have a vested interested in the company’s success, they’re more likely to work harder to make current customers happier and attract new, more desirable customers by increasing production and innovation.

Regardless of what decision the corporation comes to, it’s important they no corporation acts based on one man’s opinion. As much as Jeremy Goldstein wants to see stock option reintroduced into corporate practice, he wants every corporation to talk with their accountants before making any final decisions. Learn more: https://www.quora.com/profile/Jeremy-Goldstein-20